Marcus cuts through the paralysis of analysis that can trap us in endless philosophical discussions. While understanding virtue is important, debating its definition becomes procrastination if it replaces actually practicing virtue. This isn't anti-intellectual but rather a call to balance theory with application. We can spend years arguing about the nature of courage, justice, or wisdom, but these qualities are developed through daily acts of bravery, fairness, and thoughtful decision-making. Character is built through repeated choices, not perfect definitions. The good person emerges through consistent action aligned with our highest understanding, not through winning arguments about goodness.